Showing posts with label Corruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corruption. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 24, 2014

DEDICATED TO MR HUI & MR KWOK - THE TORTURE NEVER STOPS

WE ALL HOPE YOU FIND SOME NICE FRIENDS IN PRISON MR HUI & MR KWOK. BE AWARE THERE IS NO EXPENSIVE RED WINE & FOOD IS ONLY SO SO.......ENJOY YOUR STAY. WE VERY MUCH HOPE YOU ONLY GET STANDARD TREATMENT !

THIS IS THE KIND OF PEOPLE WE ARE ALL TIRED OFF

MR. HUI & MR. KWOK NOW IN JAIL - WE DO NOT CRY, WE DO NOT FEEL MERCY FOR THEM. THIS IS THE KIND OF PEOPLE THE NORMAL HONG KONG PEOPLE ARE VERY TIRED OFF.
Hong Kong property tycoon and former official jailed for corruption
Sun Hung Kai magnate Thomas Kwok and Rafael Hui, former deputy leader, sentenced after seven-month bribery trial
Thomas Kwok
Thomas Kwok, former chairman of Hong Kong's biggest property company, Sun Hung Kai, was sentenced to five years. Photograph: AFP/Getty
Hong Kong’s former deputy leader Rafael Hui and property tycoon Thomas Kwok have been jailed after being convicted of corruption.
Hui, 66, was sent to prison on Tuesday for seven and a half years after being found guilty of five graft charges, including misconduct in a public office, making him the highest-ranking official in Hong Kong’s history to be convicted of taking bribes.
Kwok, 63 – who was joint chairman of Hong Kong’s biggest property company, Sun Hung Kai – was sentenced to five years after he was found guilty of conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office over a series of payments totalling HK$8.5m to Hui.
The seven-month trial centred on a total of HK$34m in handouts which the prosecution said were made to Hui by Kwok and his billionaire brother, Raymond, to be their “eyes and ears” in government.
Raymond Kwok was cleared of all charges and Thomas cleared of two of the three against him.
Judge Andrew Macrae told Hui before sentencing: “To know that the former number two in government had received bribes must be a deep disappointment to many people in Hong Kong,” he said. “It is vitally important in these times the Hong Kong government and business community remain and are seen to remain corruption free, particularly when the mainland is taking obvious and positive steps to eradicate the cancer of corruption in their own jurisdiction.”
In sentencing Kwok, he said he had no doubt that he was “at heart a good man”. Macrae said he had considered a maximum sentence of six years but handed down one year less to account for Kwok’s good character.
Before the sentencing hearing, Macrae had described the case as difficult. “One is dealing with otherwise decent men who are not young, but who have committed serious offences,” he said, adding that going to prison would be a “particular hardship” for the defendants.
The payments to Hui were said to have been made via a series of complicated transactions involving middlemen.
Two middlemen, Sun Hung Kai former director Thomas Chan and Francis Kwan – the former non-executive director of investment firm New Environmental Energy Holdings – were also found guilty of two charges. Chan was sentenced to six years while Kwan was given five years.

 

Monday, November 10, 2014

THE GIFT !

Really super cheap: CY Leung going to Beijing and gets the BIG BREAKTROUGH on that shabby HKG / SHA stock connect - WOW MR Leung we all really have to say HURRAY ! What a "good person" you are. Doing so much good things for the HKG money elite ! And surely the decision for this difficult project was mostly DELAYED by the BAD STUDENTS & YOU, YES YOU MR CY LEUNG WITH YOUR SMART WORDS COULD NOW SOLVE THAT PROBLEM IN BEIJING !
 
 
CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR EFFORTS TO DO SOMETHING "GOOD" TO HKG !
 
ONLY PEOPLE WITH AN INCOME OF HKD 14,000 / MONTHLY GOING TO BUY THIS !
 

Xi Jinping gives Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying a gift over Occupy demands

BIO

Alex Lo is a senior writer at the South China Morning Post. He writes editorials and the daily “My Take” column on page 2. He also edits the weekly science and technology page in Sunday Morning Post.


The Occupy movement has always fought on two fronts: "real" democracy and the collapse of the Leung Chun-ying administration.
But it's now clear, even to its own leaders, that the immediate goal of full democratisation is unreachable, at least for the 2017 chief executive election.
So there has now been a tactical shift. The student leaders are seeking what they hope is achievable: the de-legitimisation and collapse of the government.
In that sense, the movement has morphed into the long-standing goal of the pan-democratic camp from the first day that Leung took over as chief executive - to expose his political illegitimacy.
The pan-dems' campaign of total non-cooperation must be understood in this context, though it risks the ire of the public, which may well blame them as much as the government for doing nothing.
In recent weeks student leaders have made more conciliatory statements towards Beijing. This includes saying their goal was never to challenge the authority of the central government; and blaming the first round of "biased and defective" political reform consultation on Leung's government, so Beijing might not have really understood Hong Kong people's wishes when it issued the August 31 edict on reform. Consequently, it is necessary for student leaders to hold direct talks with the central government. The real goal is to bypass Leung's government and demonstrate its irrelevance.
But Beijing has turned down any offer to meet, saying it "understands the different views in Hong Kong" and that the August 31 decision reflects its understanding of the city's actual situation.
In the past month, Beijing has repeatedly stated its support for Leung because the Occupy movement's demand for his head is seen as a direct challenge to its authority.
The delay in rolling out the Shanghai-Hong Kong stock exchange through-train has been widely seen by insiders as part of Beijing's effort to signal its displeasure at developments in Hong Kong. Over the weekend, Leung secured the green light for the stock scheme from President Xi Jinping . Coming as popular support for the Occupy movement is waning, it's Xi's gift to Leung for a victory dance.


HIGH RENT - LOW SALARIES

High rent, low salaries: how young Hongkongers are scheming to secure subsidised housing

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 06 November, 2014, 6:22pm
UPDATED : Friday, 07 November, 2014, 4:36pm
Wong Yik-mo can't wait to move out of his parents' home in Jordan, and it's easy to understand why. He and his wife are among five adults - along with his parents and older brother - sharing a 500 sq ft flat.
The little personal space means quality sleep is hard to come by.
"My dad has poor hearing. He always watches television late into the night with the volume turned up, which makes it difficult to sleep."
The 35-year-old became so desperate that, in February, he quit his job as a warehouse worker to qualify for public housing.
As incredible as it seems, Wong's drastic action makes sense in light of the dire housing opportunities for young people in Hong Kong.
Wong must apply for public housing as a single person because his mainlander wife is considered a non-resident. The HK$14,000 he earned at the warehouse exceeded the HK$9,670 salary cap for single candidates, which led to his application being rejected this year. That was when he decided he had to give up his job and put in a fresh application.
"I'm now doing odd jobs that pay day rates, mainly on construction sites or as a delivery worker. The pay is so low that I can't contribute household expenses to my parents. However, because it's much more difficult to get a flat than find a job in Hong Kong, quitting is the sensible thing to do," he says.
Stories such as Wong's are increasingly common amid the acute shortage of low-cost and subsidised housing as the cost of renting or buying private property continues to escalate.
About 28,000 new public housing flats were completed annually between 1997 and 2002, but numbers plummeted when the Sars outbreak pushed the city into recession. The supply of public rental flats has only edged up slightly in recent years, rising from 11,186 new units built in 2011 to 14,057 units in 2013.
What's more, construction of Home Ownership Scheme (HOS) units, which used to supply 18,000 subsidised mid-range flats for purchase each year, was halted in 2003. In the difficult economic climate, the government responded to developers' bitter complaints about the listless housing market by imposing an indefinite moratorium. That was lifted in 2011, but the first of the new HOS flats isn't expected to be ready until 2016.
The shortage of subsidised housing has hit young singles the hardest. The number of single applicants under 30 years old has risen more than fourfold from 13,000 in 2007 to more than 60,000 this year, about half of whom have post-secondary education.
There were 255,800 applicants awaiting public housing at the end of June. Of these, 130,000 were single people under 60 years old - quadruple the equivalent 2005 figure of 30,000 applicants.
Why are people willing to make such a big sacrifice for a home? It's a question that society should consider
Wong Kwan, chairman of the Federation of Public Housing Estates Resident and Shopowner Organisations
As a result, working-class residents go to extraordinary lengths to try to secure public housing. Besides giving up a stable job, tips making the rounds on internet forums include faking family conflicts or mental illnesses to get a flat on compassionate grounds. Because means tests are administered between six months and two years before people are considered for allocation, another common tactic is switch to lower-paying jobs when the assessment is imminent.
A 45-year-old security guard surnamed Lo has done just that. The divorcee makes more than HK$10,000 a month in her job in a Yuen Long development, but has recently asked her supervisor to schedule fewer days of work so that her salary would not exceed the limit for a single applicant.
"I check my number on the queue all the time. I know it's my turn soon to get checked," she says.
When she applied for a flat, Lo worked 12 hours every day but earned just HK$7,000. But the introduction of a minimum wage in 2011 pushed her above the eligible income bracket.
"I don't know what single person would be eligible for public housing; even a lowly security guard earns HK$10,000 now. I was forced to adopt the salary ruse," she says.
Once she secures a public rental flat, Lo can return to normal work as tenants are means tested a decade after they move in. From their 11th year, they must report their salaries to the Housing Authority every two years; those who exceed salary limits are required to pay higher rents but it is still far below private rentals.
The various ploys being adopted by residents reflect their desperation, says Wong Kwan, chairman of the Federation of Public Housing Estates Resident and Shopowner Organisations.
"People are unable to fulfil their housing needs in the private market, so they would rather seek a salary freeze or deduction, or even quit their jobs to be eligible [for public housing]. Why are people willing to make such a big sacrifice for a home? It's a question that society should consider."
Applications for public housing are separated into three queues: families (three years' wait), elderly singles (two years) and single people under the age of 60.
Under the Housing Authority's scoring system, younger singles need 170 points to secure a flat. Applicants need to be at least 18 years old, and points are awarded based on age (three points for every year above 18) and length of wait. So an 18-year-old would start with no points, a 20-year-old would have six points on application. And for every month's wait, they are given an extra point.
That's why many young people now try to beat the system by taking a similar path to Martin Lam Chun-yin's. A sound technician, he applied as soon as he turned 18. He was earning HK$8,000 at the time, putting him within the income bracket for public housing. Now 26, he should have about 96 points, but since he still lives with his family in a public housing flat, 30 points are deducted from the total.

The number of flats allocated to younger singles each year is capped at about 2,200 flats (10 per cent of the total), which means chances are slim. A recent overhaul of the scoring system further stacks the odds against young people. Under the changes that come into effect in February, applicants are awarded nine points instead of three for each year that they are above 18. People aged 45 or above receive an extra 60 points.
Lam views these measures as discrimination against young single people:
"Under the new system, single people won't be allocated a flat until they are at least 45 years old … Especially for a man, living with the family reflects badly on his image," he says. "But if I were renting, I wouldn't be able to contribute to my family."
Census figures show that the ratio of Hongkongers under 25 who are still living with their parents has increased from 93.9 per cent in 2006 to 95 per cent in 2011. For those aged between 25 and 34, the ratio rose from 43.9 per cent to 47.7 per cent.
This is understandable. Despite rising inflation and skyrocketing property prices, young people's salaries have stagnated: the median income of people aged from 15 to 24 remained at HK$8,000 for the decade from 2001 and 2011. Median income for people aged 25 to 34 rose by just HK$250 in the same period - to HK$12,500.
Under this system, it's almost impossible for single people under the age of 35 to be allotted a public housing flat, Wong Kwan says.
The figures support Wong's contention. Of 12,138 public rental flats available between 2006 and 2012, just 156 went to people aged from 30 to 39; no flats were allocated to anyone under the age of 30.
Some might get a flat on compassionate grounds such as fights in the family, and others accept flats originally designed for the elderly. There are about 40,000 such flats in blocks spread across Tuen Mun, Wong Tai Sin and Kwun Tong, which are unpopular with the elderly because toilets and kitchens are shared.
Groups stage a lie-in protest against the Housing Authority's plans to tighten up on public housing for singles under 35. Photo: K.Y. Cheng
But because these blocks are quite new, it's not sensible to tear them down. So the Housing Authority allows young people who are willing to accept those flats to jump the queue, Wong says. "It's not that young people don't mind sharing facilities, it's just that there's no way they can get a flat otherwise."
The government should increase the supply of subsidised housing to alleviate this situation, Wong says.
They could also give incentives such as mortgage schemes to encourage tenants to buy HOS flats, freeing up more public rental flats for the poor who are in greatest need of cheap accommodation.
"Before 1997, it was possible for young graduates to buy a flat after working for about 10 years. Now it's just impossible; housing prices are rising at a rate far exceeding that of salary increases. For many young people, the ultimate aim is not to secure a public housing flat but to gain eligibility as a tenant to buy an HOS flat at a deep discount. And with an HOS flat, they are no longer subject to means testing and can take on any job they like."
Wong argues that giving incentives for home purchase would still bring public savings.
"That's because the government's annual subsidy for public housing is a lot more than that for HOS flats. When HOS flats are resold in the private market, owners must pay a land premium to the government. But a family in public housing could live there for the rest of their lives and transfer the flat to their children, who also live there permanently. The subsidy to these families is a lot greater."

Sunday, November 9, 2014

And more here - nice !

ChinaLeaks: Exposé on Chinese elite’s offshore accounts comes at sensitive time

Family members of Deng Xiaoping and Xi Jinping, along with Tencent billionaire and China's richest woman, are among 20,000 people in Hong Kong, the mainland and Taiwan whose offshore holdings have been exposed.

Patrick Boehler patrick.boehler@scmp.com
Relatives of at least five current and former members of China’s top leadership have been exposed as having offshore accounts, as part of a revelatory report by investigative journalists.
The leak, part of a package of 2.5 million files obtained by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, points to nearly 22,000 offshore clients with addresses in mainland China and Hong Kong and 16,000 offshore clients from Taiwan.
"China has become a leading market for offshore havens that peddle secrecy, tax shelters and streamlined international deal-making,” the report said. “Every corner of China’s economy, from oil to green energy and from mining to arms trading, appears in the ICIJ data.”
The anti-corruption crackdowns in China may have accelerated such trends
Dali Yang, political scientist
While offshore accounts do not imply illegal behaviour per se, the report comes at a crucial moment in China’s ongoing debate on the wealth amassed by family members of China’s top leaders.
It coincides with the trial of Xu Zhiyong, the founder of the New Citizen Movement, a grass-roots campaign which has called for the declaration of assets by government officials. Xu and other members of the movement stand trial this week on charges of “assembling a crowd to disrupt public order”.
Previous reports by Bloomberg and The New York Times have revealed the wealth of the families of President Xi Jinping and former Premier Wen Jiabao, as company records and stock exchange filings made the obscure dealings of China’s elite more transparent.
The ICIJ's revelations on Wednesday has shed further light into such family fortunes.
Deng Jiagui, brother-in-law of China’s President Xi Jinping, as well as Wen Yunsong and Wen Ruchun, two children of former premier Wen Jiabao, appear to have held offshore accounts, according to the ICIJ.
Other prominent names on the Cook Islands or British Virgin Islands accounts include relatives of Deng Xiaoping, former president Hu Jintao and former premier Li Peng.
For Dali Yang, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, these offshore bank accounts are the result of concerns over the world’s second-largest economy’s stability.
“The fact that some of China’s most politically well-connected families are implicated suggest that they are as worried about the safety and anonymity of their assets as many others,” he said.
“The anti-corruption crackdowns in China may have accelerated such trends,” he added, referring to an ongoing anti-corruption campaign under Xi's administration.
Earlier this month, the Communist Party’s Central Committee revised its guidelines on cadres, barring the promotion of so-called “naked officials" -- officials with direct family members abroad.
Last year, at least 1.2 million cadres would have been affected, according to an estimate by Chinese Academy of Governance professor Zhu Lijia.
“It’ll be a stumbling block for some of these people,” said Steven Lewis from Rice University in Houston, Texas. “But they’ll go to slightly more distant relatives.”
The business connection
The ICIJ report also mentions some of China’s most prominent entrepreneurs, pointing to how the political dynasties have developed close ties with the country’s business elite.
China’s richest woman, Yang Huiyan, the majority shareholder of property developer Country Garden Holdings, China’s richest man Pony Ma Huateng, founder of internet giant Tencent, and real estate billionaire Zhang Xin, who founded Soho China, are all reported to hold so far unreported offshore accounts.
As the rich get richer ... by using the world’s shadow financial system ... the middle class, the working class and the nation’s poor suffer
Clark Gascoigne, think tank spokesperson
It also includes names of officials who have been implicated in the ongoing graft investigation against China’s former security czar Zhou Yongkang, the nation’s highest-profile probe in recent history.
Many mainland companies have sold their products at low prices to their own offshore subsidiaries. The subsidiaries then, in such structures, resell the products at higher prices avoiding the payment of some mainand tax.
The subsidiaries can then repatriate the profits or opt to keep them abroad, avoiding China’s restrictive regime on cash outflows.
Around US$400 billion have been brought back to China through trade invoicing since 2006 just through Hong Kong, the Washington-based think tank Global Financial Integrity (GFI) estimated in a report released earlier this month.
Clark Gascoigne, spokesperson for the think tank, which has been tracking global illicit money flows since 2006, said China is the world’s biggest exporter of illicit capital, ahead of Russia and Mexico. (Full story here)
“As the rich get richer through tax evasion and by using the world’s shadow financial system to shelter and multiply their illicit wealth, the middle class, the working class and the nation’s poor suffer,” he said, pointing to the government’s inability to tax those able to hide their wealth and to monitor bribes via offshore accounts.
The ICIJ report said it could substaniate evidence “that many Chinese companies and individuals have used offshore entities to engage in illicit or illegal behaviour”, citing offshore accounts by former officials of the now-dissolved Ministry of Railways and state-run shipping giant Cosco who have received jail sentences for graft in recent years.
Response to exposé
It is unclear who leaked the documents, which the ICIJ said came from two companies that help set up offshore accounts: Portcullis TrustNet in Singapore and Commonwealth Trust Limited in the British Virgin Islands.
The number of companies TrustNet established for clients in greater China more than tripled from 1,500 to 4,800 between 2003 and 2007, ICIJ said.
A dramatic decrease in company incorporations followed the ICIJ’s first release of company names in April last year. As of the end of September 2013 (the latest figures made available by the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission), new incorporations fell 14.4 per cent to 48,507.
At that time, 480,072 corporations were registered in the British overseas territory, which has a population of 23,000.
The first batch of files had already pinpointed some account holders in Hong Kong, but the consortium seems to have kept most of its China-related findings under wraps until Wednesday.
The ICIJ website was blocked in China as of Wednesday and comments on the report have been quickly deleted on Chinese social media.
“This is a continuing trend in a world where more and more information is now available covertly or overtly,” said Kerry Brown, professor of Chinese politics at the University of Sydney.
“Maybe Xi and his colleagues are being very pragmatic in admitting that the way parts of the political/business elite hid money in the past is no longer feasible: like it or not, it will be found out.”

To make it very clear what kind of people we are talking about:

The highlights of "Chinaleaks"


Reports by ICIJ and its partners revealing the secretive offshore holdings of China’s political and financial elite have generated a global wave of media coverage and an aggressive censorship campaign by Chinese authorities.
Last week, China Digital Times, a website that monitors censorship instructions, published details of a government directive to Chinese websites ordering that content related to China Leaks must be “deleted without exception,” and warning them to block user IDs of “those with an evil influence.”
Yet only days after the government scrambled to censor the story, Chinese tax commissioner Wang Jun vowed that China would step up its participation in international efforts to combat tax evasion and crack down on tax fraud within the nation.
The moves came in response to exposés published by ICIJ and more than a dozen media partners around the world, who probed various aspects of China’s hidden offshore wealth. A selection of front page stories from across the globe can be viewed here. These are some of the highlights:
  • In Switzerland, Le Matin examined how Swiss banking giant Credit Suisse helped relatives of China’s elite establish offshore holdings. Their clients included Wen Yunsong, also known as Winston Wen, the son of former Premier Wen Jiabao. You can read the stories here (in French, German and Spanish).
  • In France, correspondents from Le Monde travelled to the British Virgin Islands, the home of most of the offshore companies revealed in the reports. During a visit to a high-school class on finance, students were taught that the BVI had been caught unprepared by a powerful recent hurricane that recently battered its shores: the hurricane known as ICIJ.
  • In Hong Kong, the South China Morning Post published a detailed exposé of undeclared offshore accounts by two members of the Hong Kong government’s Commission on Poverty.
  • In Germany, Süddeutsche Zeitung probed the role of powerful banks including Deutsche Bank, UBS and Credit Suisse in helping Chinese elites set up offshore accounts. (Here’s a story about the reports in English.) Süddeutsche also produced a PDF version of their story in Chinese that could be distributed in China once the internet was blocked, and reported more than 7,600 downloads of the document in the first few days.
  • In Southeast Asia, ICIJ partners in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and the Philippines all published China Leaks exposés. CommonWealth Magazine in Taiwan revealed that more than a dozen billionaire owners of some of Taiwan’s largest corporations had offshore holdings. The Korea Center for Investigative Journalism, whose Offshore Leaks reporting earlier this year prompted the family of former dictator Chun Doo-Hwan to pay more than $150 million in fines for looting assets, published print and television reports on the revelations (in Korean).
  • In the UK and the U.S., The Guardian published reports on China Leaks and covered the sweeping censorship campaign by the Chinese government that followed. A propaganda directive by Chinese authorities ordered websites and services in China to “immediately find and remove the foreign media report “China’s Secret Offshore Tax Havens” and that “related images and accusatory comments about leaders and the system [of government] must be deleted without exception.” The directive also called on the sites to block the user IDs of “those with an evil influence.”
  • In Spain, El País examined how the Chinese elite’s offshore holdings have contributed to growing inequality in the nominally Communist country. China’s Gini coefficient, a leading measure of economic inequality, recently surpassed that of Europe and the United States. The stories were part of 19 pages in print, including consecutive front page stories, that El Pais devoted to China Leaks.
In addition to reports by ICIJ’s partners, the story was picked up by leading media outlets around the world. The international reports and responses generated by China Leaks include:
  • A lengthy report in the New York Times that detailed ICIJ’s findings. ICIJ partnered with the Times on a recent Offshore Leaks story that examined offshore trusts in the Cook Islands used to stash wealth beyond the reach of United States law.
  • The New Yorker published an examination of ICIJ’s reporting, and noted that its collaborative approach posed a broad challenge to the Chinese government’s efforts to control the foreign press.
  • The Agence France-Press published a story about ICIJ in the wake of Chinaleaks that called the report a “new coup” for the organization. The story described ICIJ as “a powerful strike force” for international investigative journalism.
  • Monitoring of China’s popular social network Sina Weibo showed that ICIJ’s interactive graphic showing Chinese princelings with offshore holdings was a popular image among users before it was targeted by censors. Once authorities began targeting the report, the acronym “ICIJ” was promptly censored from Weibo.
  • Additional media outlets that have covered the China Leaks revelations include the Associated Press, Fox News, the Financial Times, CNN, Agence France‑Presse, MSNBC and Australia’s Sydney Morning Herald, among numerous others.
A roundup of official reactions to the overall Offshore Leaks project can be seen here.

Saturday, October 18, 2014

PART 2 TVB EVENING NEWS - SEE SOME FIGHTING HERE - UGLY SCENES......................

TOO MANY PEOPLE AT THE WEEKEND ENTERTAINMENT: PROTESTING - WE JUST WONDER HOW MANY OF THE ON-LOOKERS & BY-STANDERS REALLY KNOW WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT ?

HERE THE FIGHTING PART FROM YESTERDAY NIGHT - HKG POLICE STILL VERY NICE BEHAVING COMPARED WITH FOR EXAMPLE GERMAN POLICE. ALSO MOST OF THE DEMONSTRATORS VERY PEACEFUL. SOME TROUBLE MAKERS ARE IN BETWEEN........



SOME MATCHING MUSIC WILL FOLLOW LATER !

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

LAST NIGHT - UGLY SCENES - NOT VERY GOOD POLICE BEHAVIOUR

OKAY - CLEARLY THE FOLLOWING SCENES ALREADY ALL-OVER THE WORLD. AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL COMPLAINING ALREADY. THIS 7 PLAIN CLOTH COPS DID NOT DO A FAVOUR TO THEIR COLLEAGUES OF THE HONG KONG POLICE.

AND WE THOUGHT THINGS LIKE THIS ONLY HAPPEN IN USA. 

IN GENERALLY THE HKG POLICE VERY CAREFULLY & WITH A LOT OF PATIENCE HANDLED THE LAST 18 DAYS.

A WORD TO THE STUDENT GROUPS & OTHER PROTESTORS:
IN A REAL DEMOCRACY A KIND OF THAT PROTEST IS ALSO NOT TOLERATED - YOU MUST FIND OTHER MEANS NOW TO CONTINUE YOUR MOVEMENT. IF YOU DO NOT DO SO YOU WILL HARM YOUR OWN MOVEMENT.

BE AWARE IN ANY DEMOCRATIC EUROPEAN COUNTRY YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN SWEPT FROM THE STREETS ALREADY WITH BRUTAL FORCE.

CY LEUNG HAS CANCELLED TOMORROWS PLANNED "ANSWER & QUESTION" MEETING IN LEGCO. ANOTHER BIG MISTAKE. DURING THE WHOLE PROTEST PERIOD CY LEUNG WAS THE ONE MADE ONE MISTAKE AFTER THE OTHER. HE DID NOT DO ONE THING RIGHT. ALONE THIS SHALL SEND HIM HOME
IMMEDIATELY FOR GOOD
 
ENJOY THE SHOW HERE:
 


NEWS TONIGHT 14.10.2014 - GETTING TOUGH NOW



PLEASE AVOID ANY FURTHER VIOLENCE !

Friday, October 10, 2014

CARRIE LAM & CY LEUNG - this is THE END



WE CONSIDER YOU NOW AS TRAITORS TO THE MAYORITY OF HONG KONG PEOPLE & CHINA INTEREST. YOU ARE ALL UTTERLY CORRUPT - MR XI NOT REALLY LIKES THIS.

NO EFFORTS TO FOLLOW ANY DEMANDS OF THE MOVEMENT. CARRIE WANT TO SUCCEED CY ! NO INTEGRITY TO THE PEOPLE OF HONG KONG ! LIVING ON THE PEAK MAYBE HAD LOST ALL TOUCH TO REAL LIFE IN HONG KONG. CARRIE GO HOME FOR GOOD. THIS IS THE END.

CY LEUNG - YOU PISSED OFF ALL THE PEOPLE IN DTZ - YOU ARE THE BIG WINNER - YOUR DAUGHTER CAN DO SOME MORE SHOPPING IN LANE CRAWFORD. THIS IS THE END.
NOW YOU ARE UNDER PROBE OF ICAC AND AUSSI POLICE ALREADY ? PURE ROLE MODELS WE HAVE AS LEADERS IN HONG KONG...................

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

NO WORDS IN CANTONESE & TVB NEWS ABOUT CY LEUNG'S DEALS....................

NICE - nothing about the strange money traansactions received by CY LEUNG - it seems somebody is very well controlling the MEDIA here in HKG  we are now just waiting the end of the TVB LATE NIGHT NEWS if anything is coming up here...................yes they had a very short notice on that story..............................still seems very DIRTY !!!

CY LEUNG CAUGHT - SEEMS DIRTY !

Please read here - is this THE END of CY LEUNG ?

What is so much concerned Beijings opinion on a "leader" like that ? Is he a role - model ?

WHOLE STORY SMELLS !

More here:

Hong Kong chief executive CY Leung faces questions over secret $7m payout from Australian firm

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/hong-kong-chief-executive-cy-leung-faces-questions-over-secret-7m-payout-from-australian-firm-20141008-1134yv.html#ixzz3FYqs4eov

Protesters parade a large cut-out of CY Leung's head in the streets of Hong Kong. Photo: Getty Images
Hong Kong's embattled chief executive, CY Leung, has pocketed millions in secret fees from a listed Australian company in return for supporting its Asian business ambitions, a Fairfax Media investigation can reveal.
The arrangement is outlined in a secret contract dated December 2, 2011, before he was elected chief executive, in which Australian engineering company UGL agreed to pay the Beijing-backed politician £4 million (more than $A7 million).

Hong Kong chief executive CY Leung, centre.Hong Kong chief executive CY Leung, centre. Photo: AP
The payments were made in two instalments, in 2012 and 2013, after he became Hong Kong's top official.
The payments relate to a deal in which UGL bought an insolvent 200-year old British property services firm he was associated with called DTZ Holdings, whose prospects depended on Mr Leung's network of managers and clients in Hong Kong and mainland China.
Mr Leung, who is currently battling unprecedented pro-democracy protests, strenuously defended his judgment to not declare the payments on his register of personal interests, when Fairfax brought them to his attention.

Richard Leupen at a UGL analyst presentation.Richard Leupen at a UGL analyst presentation. Photo: Michael O'Sullivan
The sale left Mr Leung with a secretive financial windfall – including an additional guarantee that UGL would pay to him an outstanding £1.5 million bonus owed by the insolvent firm – but left DTZ's other shareholders and unsecured creditors with nothing, wiping out investments and debts worth tens of millions of dollars.
Mr Leung's side deal equated to more than 5 per cent of the purchase price.
A statement from his office said the payments related to past, not future, service and they were agreed at a time when he held no official position and before he was elected chief executive.

Leung's face, with added devil horns, pasted on the road in Hong Kong's CBD.Leung's face, with added devil horns, pasted on the road in Hong Kong's CBD. Photo: AP
"The payments therefore arise from Mr Leung's resignation from DTZ, not any future service to be provided by him," said Mr Leung's spokesman, Michael Yu.
"Both the resignation from DTZ and conclusion of the agreement with UGL took place before Mr Leung was elected as the chief executive," he said. "There is no requirement under our current systems of declaration for Mr Leung to declare the above."
Mr Leung's statement added that he had stepped down as a member of Hong Kong's executive council on October 3, 2011, prior to DTZ's sale to UGL, Mr Leung was a director of DTZ and chairman of its Asia-Pacific operations when he and fellow board members decided to appoint administrators to sell the company's assets to UGL for £76 million.

The letter from Leupen to CY Leung.The letter from Leupen to CY Leung.
He announced his resignation from DTZ on November 24, formally confirmed his candidature for the role of Hong Kong chief executive on November 27 and signed the lucrative contract on December 2, 2011.
Mr Leung's resignation took effect on December 4, 2011, the day that UGL acquired DTZ.
The arrangement raises transparency questions for Mr Leung and also the Australian purchasing company, which is in the process of selling the DTZ business on to a US private equity firm, TPG.

<p>
DTZ's administrators, Ernst & Young, and its chairman at the time of its sale to UGL, Tim Melville Ross, said they were not aware of the Hong Kong politician's agreement with the Australian company.
The terms are set out under a cover letter from UGL's chief executive, Richard Leupen.
"It has been a pleasure getting to know you during this time and I look forward to continuing our relationship into the future," wrote Mr Leupen. "Your achievements in Hong Kong and China have been outstanding."

Illustration: Ron TandbergIllustration: Ron Tandberg
An attached schedule shows Mr Leung agreed to ensure that nominated members of his Asian management team remained in place and also that he would "provide such assistance in the promotion of the UGL Group and the DTZ group as UGL may reasonably require".
He also agreed to not to compete with UGL and to act as "a referee and advisor from time to time", adding in a handwritten note that his support was on the condition it "does not create any conflict of interest".
The wording appears to clash with Mr Leung's statement that the payments only related to past dealings.
The terms also contrast with DTZ's 2011 annual report, which states that Mr Leung was not to receive any payments beyond those statutorily required if his employment ceased due to a change of ownership.
In detailed answers to questions, the Australian company UGL underscored Mr Leung's immense importance to the Chinese operations of the company they were purchasing.
Crucially, UGL said the payment agreement was made not in hope of soliciting favours for the business but out of fear that he could destroy it.
"It was entered into solely to ensure CY Leung did not move to a competitor or set up or promote any business in competition with DTZ, or poach any people from DTZ, and hence to ensure the business retained its value after the UGL acquisition," said UGL.
"The China/HK business was critical to UGL's assessment of DTZ's value at the time of the acquisition," it said.
"It is standard business practice to pay for such undertakings, as you are requiring the individual to take on obligations and to forgo future opportunities."
UGL said the documentation did not include a clause to invalidate Mr Leung's payment in the event that he succeeded in his bid for office because management did not think that he would win.
"At the time of the negotiations, media coverage suggested that other candidates were favoured to be elected, so the possibility of CY Leung securing office was not the focus of UGL's negotiations," said UGL.
Leading Australian corporate integrity expert Neville Tiffen said the lack of transparency around the payments raised serious probity questions.
These questions extend to whether Mr Leung or UGL disclosed the proposed payments to DTZ's UK administrators or directors at the time the administrators and DTZ board agreed to the beleaguered company's rapid sale.
Such questions have come at an awkward time for Mr Leung, who is battling to assuage tens of thousands of students and supporters who have paralysed much of the city's central business district over the past ten days, calling for his resignation.
The protesters accuse Mr Leung of working for Beijing, at the expense of Hong Kong's promised democracy and autonomy, and failing to defend the institutions that underpin one of the world's most vibrant and successful cities.
Both sides have retreated from earlier positions and protest numbers have thinned ahead of anticipated negotiations.
UGL, the Australian firm, conceded that Mr Leung's multimillion-dollar payment deal was not disclosed in any public document but said there was no duty otherwise.
It said the main creditor, Royal Bank of Scotland, was aware of the payment and deducted the amount from the DTZ purchase price.
"This was a matter for the seller, as it was a necessary payment for the protection of the value of the business," said UGL. "The acquisition would not have proceeded if this value was not protected and assured."
DTZ's administrator, Ernst and Young, said in a statement it did not know about the arrangement.
"The Administrators have no detailed knowledge of any specific arrangements made between UGL and any other party."
The former chairman of DTZ, Tim Melville Ross, also said he was unaware of the deal between Mr Leung and UGL..
"If there were any discussions between Mr Leung and UGL, these were quite separate from the negotiations between DTZ and UGL," he said.
Corporate integrity expert and former head of global compliance for Rio Tinto, Neville Tiffen, examined the secret documents for Fairfax Media.
Mr Tiffen said: "Whenever you are offering financial benefits to public officials or directors of a company, dealings must be transparent. Without transparency, people's conduct is brought into question."

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/hong-kong-chief-executive-cy-leung-faces-questions-over-secret-7m-payout-from-australian-firm-20141008-1134yv.html#ixzz3FYr9wf56


DIRTY NOTHING ELSE ! EVEN IF NOT BEING THE CE - SUPER DIRTY !



 

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

Be aware October 1st - do not do anything stupid

message to all the better knowing guys / students / corrupt labour party leaders / democratic what ever nonsense coalitions:

BE AWARE ALL THAT AGGRESSION YOU ARE PLANNING ON THE 1ST OF OCTOBER - IT WILL ALL HIT BACK TO YOU & WHOLE HONG KONG - IT WILL NOT BE FOR THE GOOD - IT WILL BE VICE VERSA ! YOU ALL DID NOT READ BASIC LAW _ YOU ARE ALL DREAMING - BETTER TAKE CARE MORE THE REAL ISSUES HONG KONG IS FACING:

- POVERTY
- PROPERTY PRICES
- FOOD SCANDALS
- POLLUTION
- INFLATION
- PRICE HIKES
- UNEMPLOYMENT
- FAKE GOODS

AND YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT A NONSENSE CE ELECTIONS ? GET YORSELF RIGHT IN TRACK !

Rafael Hui - a handful of shame for Hong Kong

This is excactly the kind of people we DO NOT NEED here in Hong Kong. But this Rafael Hui was part of Hong Kong government in top position. How many others will follow suit. Or was Mr. Hui just too stupid and the other are more smart to cover the "deals" ? Here some news about the honourful Mr. Hui. Lets hope he will end in jail.

Former Hong Kong chief secretary Rafael Hui says he accepted secret payoff from Beijing - See more at: http://business.asiaone.com/news/former-hong-kong-chief-secretary-rafael-hui-says-he-accepted-secret-payoff-beijing#sthash.dUCE9dAD.dpuf

ReutersTuesday, Sep 23, 2014HONG KONG - A former top Hong Kong civil servant told a court on Tuesday that he had received a secret payment of HK$11 million (S$1.8 million) "from Beijing" in 2007 through a businessman intermediary, local media reported. Hong Kong's former chief secretary, Rafael Hui, was testifying in one of the financial hub's largest corruption trials, charged with accepting "concealed and disguised" payments from property tycoons Thomas and Raymond Kwok, the billionaire co-chairmen of Asia's largest developer, Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd, seeking government favour. Hui's testimony broadens the corruption implications of the case beyond Hong Kong, which returned to Chinese rule in 1997, and raises new questions on the ties between Hong Kong and Chinese officials. The case involves a series of payments and loans totalling more than HK$37 million allegedly paid to Hui, who headed Hong Kong's civil service from 2005 to 2007. Hui told the High Court that one particular payment worth some HK$11 million had been facilitated by Liao Hui, the influential former head of China's Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office in Beijing, Hong Kong's public broadcaster RTHK reported. Hui told the court that during a meeting with Liao in Hong Kong in 2007, Liao had asked him to stay in his post for longer. Hui had declined, saying he had financial difficulties and that he'd prefer a higher-paying private sector job, RTHK reported. Hui cited Liao as saying that he would think of ways to help him out financially. Around half a year later, a former stock exchange official, Francis Kwan, approached Hui, after he had stepped down as chief executive, to say that "someone from Beijing" had contacted him and that there was now some money available, Hui told the court. He said he accepted the money, though it was not immediately clear what the payment was for. The source wasn't immediately made clear to Hui. But in 2008, on the sidelines of a meeting in Beijing, Liao suggested he had played a role. "I've now helped you. Don't overspend any more," Hui quoted Liao as saying to him at the time. The case has thrown a spotlight on the close relationship between the city's powerful developers and government in the former British colony, which returned to Chinese rule with wide-ranging autonomy and a separate legal system from the mainland. Liao was one of China's most experienced officials overseeing Hong Kong affairs during his time as director of the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs office - a high-level body under the State Council, or China's cabinet, in the years after 1997. Billionaire brothers' Hong Kong graft trial begins Click on thumbnail to view. Story continues after photos. Photos: AFP, Reuters, Bloomberg Who are the Kwok brothers and what do they own? Click on thumbnail to view. Story continues after photos. Photos: Courtesy of Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited, Bloomberg, AFP, Reuters Related Stories - See more at: http://business.asiaone.com/news/former-hong-kong-chief-secretary-rafael-hui-says-he-accepted-secret-payoff-beijing#sthash.dUCE9dAD.dpuf

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Taiwan gutter oil / lard - surely in HKG "no problem" - how naive the people are ?

‘Gutter Oil’ Scandal Raises Food-Safety Fears Once Again in Greater China

Travel Trip Hong Kong on a Budget
A man buys a cake from Maxim's Cakes in Mongkok, Hong Kong, in this file photo from Dec. 18, 2008 Kin Cheung—AP

Potentially harmful oil may have been used in pastries sold by popular bakery chain and also 7-Eleven

A Taiwanese food-safety scare has spread to Hong Kong with the revelation that the city’s biggest bakery chain, as well as branches of 7-Eleven and Starbucks, may have been selling pastries made with so-called gutter oil.
The Hong Kong–based South China Morning Post reports that the popular breakfast staple known as pineapple buns, offered in branches of Maxim’s Cakes and 7-Eleven, as well two specialty Starbucks outlets, could have been made with gutter oil — a potentially harmful blend of oil extracted from food waste, offal and the byproducts of tanneries.
The news once again puts the issue of food safety under the spotlight in a part of the world that has been bedeviled by everything from adulterated baby milk formula to exploding watermelons and even fake eggs.
The Post said that since August 2011 Maxim’s Cakes had bought 34 tons of oil from a Hong Kong importer, who in turn purchased it from Chang Guann, a major lard supplier based in Taiwan. The oil was used to make the bakery chain’s iconic pineapple buns — so called not because they contain pineapple but because of the distinctive shape of the sugar and biscuit crust baked onto the buns’ surface. All the items have now been recalled.
Police in Taiwan last week said that Chang Guann had purchased 243 tons of oil from a gutter oil ring in southern Taiwan since March. The Taiwanese lard giant — which says it was unaware that the oil was gutter oil — in turn sold 51,981 cartons of oil to hundreds of food companies around Asia, according to Taiwan’s Food and Drug Administration.
Authorities in Taiwan say that over a thousand Taiwanese companies have used oil supplied by Chang Guann to make a total of 139 different products. Local groceries across China pulled several Taiwanese brands of dumplings, sauces and noodles from their shelves over the weekend.
Many regional food suppliers and restaurants harbor reservations about the quality of food from China, where a series of recent scandals — including chicken feet marinated in hydrogen peroxide and the use of expired meat by one of the country’s top food suppliers — continues to unsettle consumers.
Still, Taiwan had boasted a better reputation.
“Bakeries from Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore have done particularly well in China because of worries about locally produced food,” wrote the New York Times, in a Sept. 6 article about the Mid-Autumn Festival pastries known as moon cakes.
But in the wake of the Chang Guann scandal, revelers could be shunning Taiwanese moon cakes this year. Hong Kong health officials told Agence France-Presse that moon cakes sold around the city are undergoing checks.
Maxim’s has told the Hong Kong authorities its moon cakes were not made with contaminated oil, but lab tests are being carried out, the Post reports.
[SCMP]

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

TODAY !

the message will be delivered to Hong Kong people: Universal suffrage will be conducted according to THE BASIC LAW. Full stop. The Byrds give us the soundtrack for that.